Theoretical Framework

The Science Behind MindPolis

Our assessment model is built strictly on validated frameworks from social psychology, moral psychology, and political science. We avoid generic partisan labels in favor of identifying fundamental structural values.

1. Moral Foundations Theory (MFT)

Jonathan Haidt & Jesse GrahamBook: The Righteous Mind (2012) ↗

Moral Foundations Theory was proposed to explain the evolutionary origins of and cross-cultural variation in human moral reasoning. It posits that there are multiple, distinct "taste buds" of morality.

MindPolis uses these foundations to understand the innate moral intuitions driving policy preferences, recognizing that political differences are often differences in moral priorities rather than logic.

Moral AxisPsychological Focus
Care / HarmEmpathy, protecting the vulnerable, compassion, and sensitivity to suffering.
Fairness / CheatingProportionality, justice, rights, and punishing free-riders (strongly related to reciprocal altruism).
Loyalty / BetrayalPatriotism, self-sacrifice for the group, and maintaining in-group coalitions.
Authority / SubversionDeference to leading figures, respect for traditions, and maintaining hierarchical social order.
Sanctity / DegradationPurity, physical/spiritual contamination, and viewing the body as a temple rather than a playground.
Liberty / OppressionResistance to domination, anti-authoritarianism, and the desire for autonomy.

2. Schwartz Theory of Basic Human Values

Shalom H. SchwartzAcademic Paper (1992) ↗

Recognized as one of the most reliable and highly cited cross-cultural models of human values in the social sciences. Schwartz identified a universal structure of basic motivational values recognized across cultures.

These values are arranged in a circular structure, highlighting the conflicts and congruities among them (e.g., self-enhancement versus self-transcendence, openness to change versus conservation).

Core ValueDefining Goal
UniversalismUnderstanding, appreciation, tolerance, and protection for the welfare of all people and for nature.
BenevolencePreservation and enhancement of the welfare of people with whom one is in frequent personal contact.
Tradition / ConformityRespect, commitment, and acceptance of the customs and ideas that traditional culture or religion provide.
SecuritySafety, harmony, and stability of society, of relationships, and of self.
Power / AchievementSocial status and prestige, control or dominance over people and resources; personal success through demonstrating competence.
Self-Direction & StimulationIndependent thought and action; choosing, creating, exploring, and seeking novelty and challenge.

3. World Values Survey (WVS)

Inglehart–Welzel Cultural MapExplore Dataset ↗

The WVS is the largest non-commercial, cross-national data series investigating human beliefs and values. Since 1981, it has tracked cultural value changes globally.

MindPolis incorporates the fundamental Inglehart-Welzel axes to understand the tension between institutional survival and democratic self-expression.

Survey AxisCultural Implications
Traditional vs. Secular-RationalSocieties scoring high on traditional values emphasize the importance of religion, parent-child ties, deference to authority, and traditional family values.
Survival vs. Self-ExpressionSurvival values emphasize economic and physical security. Self-expression values give high priority to environmental protection, growing tolerance, and participation in decision-making.
Institutional TrustThe degree to which individuals maintain confidence in government bodies, the press, and civil societal institutions.
Socio-political SecurityAttitudes toward national identity, immigration, authoritarian leadership, and the prioritization of structural order.

Ready to map your political cognition?

Begin assessment →